Showing posts with label hydropower. Show all posts
Showing posts with label hydropower. Show all posts

Thursday, September 18, 2014

B.C. Hydro on the edge of change as huge growth planned for North

B.C. Hydro on the edge of change as huge growth planned for North

B.C.’s north is in a frenzy of planning. There are applications for port expansions, coal and mineral mines, oil terminals, pipelines, synthetic fuel plants, liquefied natural gas facilities and hundreds of new drill rigs for shale gas extraction.

While the North is poised for unprecedented growth, BC Hydro is at pivotal moment in its history. Key energy decisions remain undecided by the policy makers in Victoria who will shape how big, how fast and how green that development will be.
Competing interests are demanding lower rates, more flexible service, a tougher watchdog, a leaner corporation.
Since 1962, the Crown utility has played a fundamental role in opening up the province to industrial development. What happens next in the North will determine what role B.C. Hydro plays in the province’s in the future.
The electricity grid mostly runs one way: The North supplies 35 per cent of all of B.C.’s hydro-electric power, but half of that is consumed in the South.
For all the North’s new, energy-hungry endeavours – which could easily double +BC Hydro's current industrial demand if only a third of them are built – the power isn’t set to return.
Sandwiched between demands for huge dividends to the provincial government and outrage from its ratepayers over threatened rate hikes, B.C. Hydro is prepared to walk away from its new customers. If these developments are built, many will have to provide their own power by burning natural gas.
This runs counter to the government’s legislated targets to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
But that core agenda of Gordon Campbell’s B.C. Liberal government no longer resonates with the Liberals under Premier Christy Clark. The clean-energy mantra has been replaced by one that puts investment first, and fiscal restraint a close second.
But B.C. Hydro is poised to pass along hefty rate increases – as much as 26 per cent – to its 1.9 million industrial, commercial and residential customers.
That figure, contained in a leaked draft document, has become a lightning rod for customer complaints about bloated Hydro salaries, the $1-billion smart-meter program, contracts with private power producers, and more. In that framework, Hydro can use the need to contain spending as insulation against demands to offer new supplies of clean, renewable power.
“The challenge is that we find ourselves, in 2013, with limited options for taking that pressure off,” Energy Minister Bill Bennett said in an interview. Months ago he was vowing to “get a grip” on Hydro’s gold-plated operations. Now, he warns it is a long-term turnaround project. “It’s a large Crown, under repair.”
Residential customers – who still enjoy some of the lowest rates in North America – would direct their anger at the B.C. Liberal government that promised to keep rates low, but the next election is more than three years away. In 2006 British Columbia had the second lowest rates of 22 jurisdictions and in 2012 B.C. was fourth lowest.
Bigger customers have other leverage: Investment decisions may hinge on what Hydro will or will not offer. And those already on the grid warn the threatened rate hikes would lead to job losses.
Catalyst Paper is Hydro’s largest industrial customer, consuming 5 per cent of the entire provincial electricity load. The company sent every MLA a warning this summer: The company contributes $2-billion annually to the provincial economy across 25 communities – and that is at risk in the face of double-digit rate hikes.
“Energy is a big cost item for us,” said Lyn Brown, Catalyst’s vice-president for marketing. It is the company’s second-largest expense, after fibre. Having just climbed out of creditor protection through a major restructuring last year, “any rate increases could wipe all that heavy lifting away,” she said.
Part of the difficulty in tackling rate hikes is that the government has been circumventing the utility’s regulator to suppress rates in advance of the election.
By “smoothing” rates, B.C. Hydro has racked up billions of dollars in “deferral accounts” which it now must start to repay.
And, the aging infrastructure needs to be maintained. The Ruskin dam in the Fraser Valley is more than 80 years old and increasingly unreliable. B.C. Hydro is now spending more than $700-million to reduce earthquake risk and upgrade the powerhouse. It’s just one part of the $2-billion it is spending each year to maintain the grid.
Given those limitations, letting industry in the North use cheap, abundant natural gas to satisfy new energy needs offers a tempting relief valve.
The Clean Energy Association of B.C. estimates that, conservatively, the potential load growth in the North could add up to 35,000 gigawatt hours annually by the year 2026. Last year, B.C. Hydro’s load for the entire province was about 51,000 gigawatt hours.
Paul Kariya, executive director for the association, believes that B.C. could meet the pending demands in the North with clean energy. But he worries that the government is too preoccupied to consider the long-term planning that is required.
“There are two things on government’s mind: the rate hike and the balanced budget,” he said. B.C. Hydro will contribute about $1.8-billion in dividends over the next three years and that reliance on the Crown corporation limits just how big a stick Mr. Bennett wields.
“They want to get through the next two years somehow, but they’ve got to do something about the bow wave of those rates,” said Mr. Kariya, adding that the government may need to consider a reset for Hydro, to write down some of the debt to start fresh.
There is little appetite in Victoria for such an intervention, however. Mr. Bennett wants the corporation to behave more like a commercial operation, but he appears to be largely in agreement with B.C. Hydro’s current approach to new demand.
The Crown utility will table its integrated resource plan later this month, mapping out how it intends to meet future needs. But its draft plan offers to meet just a fraction of that potential new load. Some of the biggest demand would come from the new LNG industry that the provincial government has made a top priority. B.C. Hydro concludes that most LNG proponents will meet 90 per cent of their energy needs with natural gas. To meet the ancillary demand, Hydro proposes to build its own gas-turbine-powered electrical generation facility in the Kitimat region.
The final plan hasn’t yet been approved by the province, and a backlash is building. An internal report, obtained by The Globe and Mail, shows industrial users are frustrated by the Crown utility’s modern concept of customer service.
“Delays in transmission availability are cited as an obstacle to industrial development in British Columbia. B.C. Hydro’s transmission interconnection process is perceived as slow, cumbersome, unresponsive and expensive by customers,” the draft report, dated Oct. 4, says.
Tom Syer, senior executive for policy at the B.C. Business Council, released a report last week urging the province to take a stronger role in making sure the Crown utility becomes more nimble.
“They were, and remain, a foundation of our industrial infrastructure,” he said. “It is a critical time. We have serious competitive challenges and it is an identified issue for those who want to make big investments – they need to know B.C. Hydro’s system is working for them.”
A major policy obstacle remains the province’s climate-change targets, he said. By law, British Columbia must cut its greenhouse-gas emissions by at least 33 per cent below 2007 levels by the year 2020.
“There is a need to reconcile and where necessary revise climate-change objectives,” Mr. Syer said. “The simple reality is you cannot do this level of development – even if we did choose to use clean electricity inputs – and meet the GHG targets.”
The Energy Minister says those are decisions that still must be made by the B.C. cabinet. But this is a government that has been consumed with the pursuit of a new LNG industry – the climate-change law was the agenda of a previous Liberal administration.
“It may make more sense to let the companies use natural gas to drive their compressors,” Mr. Bennett said. “I’m doing my best as energy minister to try to carve out some opportunity for the clean energy sector in this province to continue investing. Having said that, I can’t do that to the extent that it is going to put pressure on rates. There is enough pressure on rates already.”
Richard Stout, executive director of the Association of Major Power Customers of B.C., said ratepayers big and small all have an interest in seeing B.C. Hydro reined in. He doesn’t quibble about the infrastructure spending but suggests the province is skimming far too much profit.
“Customers would be better off if B.C. Hydro was privatized – shareholders don’t expect that kind of profit.”
The draft report by the government’s industrial rate review, which will be finalized in the coming weeks, points to government intervention as a key problem. Mr. Stout says it is time the B.C. Utilities Commission was restored as Hydro’s watchdog.
“If you don’t allow an independent regulator to get involved, then rates are going to hell in a hand basket.”
The NDP’s energy critic, John Horgan, is not against the notion of burning natural gas in lieu of renewable electricity – especially if it helps B.C. Hydro escape from its present, costly bind.
But choosing the way forward – a future of clean energy or a future that increasingly relies on burning natural gas for power – is a decision that the public should be a part of, he said.
“It’s a big pivot. Let’s let the public decide.”
Justine Hunter - The Globe and Mail

Friday, September 5, 2014

Stay Clear, Stay Safe - Dam Safety

Always an important message when it comes to hydroelectric power.

Ontario Power Generation (OPG) is urging the public to exercise extreme caution around waterways, and to be mindful of water safety especially near or around hydroelectric stations and dams.

"Stay clear, stay safe is a simple message," says Mike Martelli, OPG's Senior Vice President of Hydro-Thermal Operations. "Ontario's lakes and rivers are popular holiday weekend destinations but people need to keep themselves and their families safe by paying attention to the warnings signs, fences and booms around hydroelectric stations."
Most hydroelectric facilities are controlled remotely by operators located many kilometres away. As a result, dams can suddenly open at any time, creating rapid change to water levels and flows, while producing deadly undertows.
Additional water safety information can be found online at www.stayclearstaysafe.ca including links to OPG's water safety partners - the Ontario Provincial Police, and the Ontario Federation of Anglers and Hunters.

SOURCE Ontario Power Generation Inc.

Wednesday, January 12, 2011

St’at’imc, BC Hydro and the Province of BC initial agreement | Local News | Bridge River Lillooet News, Lillooet, BC

St’at’imc, BC Hydro and the Province of BC initial agreement | Local News | Bridge River Lillooet News, Lillooet, BC


After negotiating since 1993, BC Hydro and the Province of British Columbia have initialed a final agreement with the St’at’imc. The agreement, which has to be ratified by members of the 11 communities, settles past grievances caused by existing Hydro dams and transmission lines.
Mike Leach, Chair of St’at’imc Chiefs Council, has been involved in the negotiations since, as he put it, before day one. Leach said it was BC Hydro who analyzed their situation legally and politically and made a decision to negotiate but they only wanted to negotiate reserve issues when they wanted to install another transmission line.
“We indicted to them that no there was an unresolved issue called our territory so therefore the negotiations would have to be expanded to the territory,” said Leach. “So that’s how we ended up with community settlements and a St’at’imc agreement.”
There are three main components to the agreement. The first deals with how BC Hydro manages their impact on the environment from ratification of the agreement forward including managing water levels to ensure they are high enough for salmon to come up the river.
The second component is the framework for future development. Now when BC Hydro wants to put in any more transmission lines or another damn, the corporation will have to go through a very specific process with the St’at’imc which is outlined in the agreement. This process includes education, consultation and consensus.
The third part of the agreement is generating the most attention. This is the monetary settlement for past grievances and is reported to be worth between $200 and $210 million. While each of the communities will receive individual sums, there is also an amount that will be placed in a trust and administered over the next 50 to 99 years.
Leach explained this will guarantee the fund is there for future generations. “If managed properly it can do many things for the communities.”
“The most important thing about this agreement is that basically it’s not really entirely just based on money,” said Leach. “The concept of this whole agreement is based on multiple issues that had to be dealt with because of past impacts. So we consider it a small measure of justice meaning that there are many issues between us and the province. It sets a very good tone between the relationship between the province and the St’at’imc for one thing to accomplish this agreement and we’ve gone into this agreement really about trying to get some resources to our communities that they don’t have and about making sure that future generations are going to be able to have some access to this settlement.”
Leach said that the key to this whole issue is how it’s managed after the signing ceremonies and that’s when the work really starts to ensure both sides uphold the agreement. “It’s a living agreement meaning everyone just doesn’t go home at the end of the day. Hydro stays, we stay and the province stays.”
Members of the 11 communities will have a chance to vote on the agreement in the next few months and Leach said the response from the community members has been quite positive. “I see that there would be a yes vote from the communities.”
Leach said he is more concerned that the people get the information because, he said, it has to be an informed vote and not just a vote because of the money. “We have to prove that yes, there is money available and that there has got to be good government and all those kind of things that go with this package. There has to be transparency, there has to be accountability.”
“This is a benefit for Lillooet. It’s an opportunity for Lillooet,” Leach said. “The spin-offs to the local merchants and recreational issues – I think there are going to be great spin-offs for everybody on this particular arrangement.”

Monday, January 10, 2011

Run-of-river projects need to be reconsidered


Both of B.C's major provincial parties are going through a time of enormous change, and it's fitting that we stop to recognize the contributions Carole James and Gordon Campbell have made to the public life of this province. Regardless of one's political orientation we need to acknowledge the dedication and commitment it takes to lead a political party and run for elected office.
Having said that, however: in my estimation, Ms. James and the NDP made a critical mistake during the last provincial election when they decided to oppose run-of-river power projects. They bought into the anti-private-sector propaganda pounded into their heads by the province's public sector union leaders and as a result they lost the support of many well informed B.C. environmentalists who knew the real facts.
Anyone familiar with run-of-river projects knows they have a negligible environmental impact compared to other forms of energy production. Run-of-river projects are a perfect fit for B.C.'s mountainous, snow-covered terrain and wet coastal climate, and other places in the world would give their eye teeth to have access to the clean hydro resources we have. We can only hope that the NDP will don their 20/20 hindsight goggles next time around, learn from their past mistake, and start supporting renewable energy projects again instead of maligning them.
Mike Taylor
Coquitlam
Run-of-river projects need to be reconsidered

Thursday, January 6, 2011

China adding 140 GW of hydro by 2015

Zhang Guobao, China's top energy official, stated that China will increas its nuclear power capacity by 38 gigawatts and hydropower capacity by 140 gigawatts by 2015.  It was also suggested that there will be more large-scale windfarms installed in Inner Mongolia and Gansu province.